Threat Modelling Under APRA CPS 234: Evidence for the Design-Time Obligations
How threat modelling gives APRA-regulated entities defensible evidence for CPS 234's design-time control obligations, and a process that fits alongside CPS 230.
Tagged “Threat Modeling”
How threat modelling gives APRA-regulated entities defensible evidence for CPS 234's design-time control obligations, and a process that fits alongside CPS 230.
How to threat model AI systems: STRIDE extended for LLM applications, the OWASP LLM Top 10 mapped to design-time decisions, and a worked RAG example.
A step-by-step threat modeling guide: scope the system, draw the data flow diagram, mark trust boundaries, enumerate threats with STRIDE, map controls, and decide.
STRIDE threat modeling explained: what each of the six categories means, eighteen concrete example threats, how to run STRIDE against a data flow diagram, and a template.
Eight tools for threat modeling and security design review, compared honestly by a vendor that competes with most of them: who each one is actually for, what changed after the ThreatModeler-IriusRisk deal, and how AI reshuffled the category.
STRIDE, PASTA, and LINDDUN answer different questions. A side-by-side comparison of what each finds, what it costs to run, and how to choose for your team.
A walkthrough of one representative afternoon: a whiteboard photo becomes an editable architecture diagram, a written design explanation, a STRIDE threat model with mapped controls, and a signed design record before the end of the day.
The workshop is the scaling bottleneck of threat modeling, not the analysis. How an async-first process covers more systems with less calendar: structured intake, diagrams from what exists, proposed threats, and one short conversation where judgment actually matters.