Platform · AI Assistant · Solution Architecture with AI
AI is very good at producing architecture artefacts and very bad at owning architecture decisions. Alvor splits the work accordingly: the studios draft the diagram, the design explanation, and the threat model with you, while the seven-phase workflow keeps intake, baselines, approvals, and sign-offs exactly where they belong: with your team.
The definition
The bottleneck in most architecture practices is not judgment, it is artefacts. Diagrams take an afternoon someone does not have, design documents wait on the one engineer who knows the why, and the threat model waits for a workshop that keeps slipping. So decisions get made anyway, and the record trails weeks behind reality.
Used well, AI removes the artefact bottleneck without touching the decision rights. In Alvor, Design with AI draws the candidate architecture while an engineer describes it. Write with AI interviews the team and turns the answers into a structured design explanation. Model with AI reads the diagram and proposes the threat model as batches you review. Every artefact arrives as a draft; nothing becomes the record without a human accepting it.
The difference from asking a general-purpose chatbot to 'design my architecture' is context and governance. The assistant works against your real project: its business impact analysis, your control and threat libraries, your assets. And the process around it is governed: designs baseline, changes past high-level design are classified by a human, and the sign-off matrix is people, not prompts.
How it works
Project intake and business impact analysis set criticality and constraints before anyone draws a box.
Design with AI turns a spoken description, or a whiteboard photo, into a reference-style diagram of real, editable shapes.
Write with AI describes what it sees, interviews the team a few questions at a time, and writes the design explanation into the live editor.
Model with AI registers STRIDE elements, proposes threats from your library, and maps mitigating controls, one approval card per batch. Mapped controls become required build controls.
Approvals and architecture decisions stay human, changes past high-level design are governed, and one click exports the full design document as a PDF.
Intake through go-live, with the design phases the studios accelerate sitting inside a process auditors can follow.
Criticality, data sensitivity, and availability needs captured up front, so design decisions have context.
Design with AI for the diagram, Write with AI for the explanation, Model with AI for the threat model. Drafts, never decisions.
Controls mapped during threat modeling become required, threat-driven build controls on the project.
Past high-level design the studio will not touch a baselined model; a human classifies the change as major or minor.
Project, people, BIA, every diagram with its explanation, the threat model, and the sign-off matrix, exported as a reviewable PDF.
The assistant is an alternative interface for the signed-in user, never a new principal. It sees what you can see, drafts what you could create, and approvals stay human.
Questions
No, and Alvor is deliberately not built as if it could. AI is excellent at producing the artefacts of architecture: diagrams, explanations, threat enumerations. It is not accountable for trade-offs, and it cannot own a decision. In Alvor the studios draft every artefact, while intake, baselines, change classification, and the sign-off matrix remain human. Architects spend their time on judgment instead of drawing tools.
Keep exploring
Get started
Whether you lead security, run IT, manage compliance, or sit in the C-suite - we'll show you your view.