Build · The implementation
A roadmap is only worth the controls it becomes. Remediation delivery is where the blueprint turns into a working program: we close every open gap against the design, deliver it hands-on, alongside your partners, or by directing your own team, and nothing is marked done until the control is validated and the evidence is there to prove it.
Scope agreed in writing before any work. No obligation.
What you are commissioning
The flagship engagement of the Build track backs this page. Scope is sized to the gap register, with milestones agreed before any work begins.
Build trackSized to the gap register
Close the gap register against the blueprint, control by control.
Best for teams with a blueprint and gaps to close.
Includes
Deliverables
The method
Every remediation traces to the target architecture and the control set, so the work builds toward a coherent end state rather than patching symptoms. Closing gaps without a design just rearranges the exposure.
Hands-on by our engineers, alongside your existing delivery partners, or by directing your own team under our oversight. The model flexes to your capacity and your preference; the accountability does not move.
Each control is tested against its specification before it is called done. Marking a gap closed in a tracker is not the same as the control working, and we do not confuse the two.
Closure produces the evidence, structured to your assessor's criteria, as it happens, so audit preparation is not a separate scramble later. The proof is built in, not bolted on.
You have the design and the gap register; what you lack is the delivery capacity to close it without pulling your whole team off the roadmap. We bring the hands and the direction.
Gaps get closed, then reopen, because nothing was validated and the evidence was never captured. You need closure that actually sticks.
An audit, a customer, or a board has given you findings with a deadline, and you need them genuinely remediated, not just marked addressed in a tracker.
What 'done' means here
The difference between a remediation that holds and one that reopens is whether anyone validated it. We make validation the definition of done.
Each control tested against its specification, not its description
Evidence captured in the assessor's shape as the work lands
The closed register doubles as the on-ramp to Operate
Questions
Ideally yes, because remediation without a target state just moves the exposure around. If you do not have one, we can scope a lightweight architecture and control set first, or work to an existing design you hold. What we do not do is close gaps with no coherent end state to build toward.
Yes, and often that is the most economical model. We set the architecture and the standard, validate the result, and direct your engineers through the work, so you build internal capability while we stay accountable for the outcome. We can also deliver hands-on where you lack the capacity.
Against the gap register: the remediation is scoped to the gaps to be closed, with milestones agreed before the work begins. It is delivered as a project with a defined scope and a clear definition of done.
You hold a closed register, the validated controls, and the evidence. From there you can take the run in-house with the run book, or hand it to us under Operate with the same team and nothing rebuilt. The choice is yours.
No, by design. We take you to assessor-ready and validate the controls ourselves, but the certificate or attestation is issued by an independent body. We build the posture; your assessor judges it.
One conversation, then the scope and the price in writing. Your enquiry arrives already marked for remediation delivery.